Rising to the Potential Within Us
Although times have
changed and ideas are evolving, in the past there has been a sense of familial
structure that was acceptable to society. The father was generally seen as the
one that led the family, making the decisions, and ensuring order and
success. The mother was the caregiver of
the children, the nurturer, and the one who maintained the daily running of the
household. It became a bit fuzzier with
the children because there hasn’t been a set structure for children aside from
the fact that they were to be obedient to their parents and help pull their
weight within the household. However,
what weight they were expected to pull was usually left to interpretation
within each familial structure. There have
been times, way more often than we would hope and more than anyone wants to
admit, when the accepted cultural structure of a family has not conformed or has
become disrupted for whatever reason. We
saw three very good examples of this disruption in our readings this
semester. I would like to break down the
components of the family and focus on each individual and how they were
represented in each reading.
FATHERS
The fathers showed
up in some very different ways. The Commandant
in “The Marquise of O-” written by Heinrich Von Kleist, appears to be a very strict father with high
expectations for his family, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, nor is it a
surprise when you consider the position he held in society. He had a reputation to uphold when it came to
his family and their place in higher society.
When the socially acceptable order of his household was disrupted by a
pregnancy out of wedlock by his daughter he becomes furious. Knowing how this will affect the whole family,
he banishes his daughter and disowns her because he does not believe in her claimed
innocence. As he is trying to protect
the reputation of his family and maintain the structure that has been
established, he is very strong and stands erect trying to maintain what he has
fought so hard to build within his family and in community. He will not sit by and let an act by his
daughter ruin their standing in society.
In contrast to this
familial structure where the father takes such a leading role we have the
father in “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka. In this family,
the father starts out as someone who does not take his role as father at
all. He does not work, and in fact, it
seems that he rarely even stands erect.
He sits around eating and reading the newspapers all day in his robe and
requires his son to take his role as patriarch and support the family. He provides no support to the family
financially or in any other way.
However, after his son’s metamorphism, making him unable to provide, the
father picks up his role and begins to work and assume the natural structure of
the family as a provider. He begins to
stand up for his family and in fact, at one point Gregor, the son, realizes
that roles have changed when he sees his father in his uniform he wears for
work and has to look up, tilting his head back, in order to look at his
father. He describes his confusion at
seeing this man who used to always be either sitting or lying down and “being
quite incapable of standing up” but now “stood quite steady” while in turn, he,
Gregor, is now the one creeping around close to the floor, unable to stand
erect.
Mark Jarman's story of “Iris”
lacks the typical familial structure.
Although there are men who play the role of husband and father, they
come and go and there is not a stable figure.
There is one reference that I believe created a great deal of influence
on Iris, and that was the man that she was married to for 4 years who beat
her. I also believe that Iris’s
childhood was filled with different husbands and boyfriends of her mother’s,
and this would have played a large role in her feeling that life had always
been “attained through horizontal movement.
Flight was escape, and rescue and escape were Iris’s religion.”, even
though the men weren’t around long.
Without the stability of a father figure or male role, I can imagine the
feeling of insecurity and lack of safety that Iris might have felt her whole
life, always running to get away from them.
I also feel like that might be why she became so entrenched in Robinson
Jeffers and living vicariously through his poetry. He became a male figure she could relate to
and go to when she needed guidance.
Everyone needs to feel safety and security and without a male figure in
her life, she sought it out in her readings and felt that connection with
Jeffers.
MOTHERS
The mothers of these
stories also had unique roles. In “The
Marquise of O-” the mother is one who seems to stand up to her daughter and can
be very aggressive and demanding of her, however, she is down on her knees a
lot when she is around her husband and begging for the sake of the
daughter. She is very nurturing and
wants to do what she can to allow her daughter to return back into the family
structure after she has been banished, however, she is also conniving in trying
to trick the daughter into admitting her secret. I see the mother as bouncing back and forth
between her allegiance to her daughter and to her husband.
In “The
Metamorphosis” the mother seems to be slightly nurturing when Gregor is thought
to be sick in the beginning but once she discovers he has changed she loses the
ability to look at him, see him, or interact with him. Her concern seems to be more about the
structure and order of the family and what will happen now that he is no longer
providing. However, similar to the
father, the mother rises to the occasion and takes her place in the family
structure when it is required. They let
the maid go and the mother assumes the responsibility of cooking and also
begins sewing to help bring in financial support as well.
In “Iris” the role
of mother is the most important role both with Iris’s mother and also with Iris
as a mother. Iris follows the example of
her mother and just allows herself to latch on to whatever man is willing to
help provide despite the dysfunctional relationship or dynamics of the family
structure. She is proud of the fact that
her relationships at least lasted longer than her mother’s did. As a
mother Iris is very protective of her daughter and tries to provide for
her. I like the line “She had herself
lifted her daughter up away from death, but as a mother cat mouths a kitten in
its fangs and picks it off the floor.”
She knew that she had helped her daughter to rise above the difficulties
of their life and had protected her enough to give her a better life. I don’t believe there is a better depiction
of a mother than one who can help her children rise above life’s trials.
CHILDREN
The role of children
in these stories is interesting. While
Gregor is required to assume the role of the provider for his family in “The
Metamorphosis” he is never really appreciated for what he does, and in fact,
seems to be even looked at as holding the family back in some ways. I was frustrated at the end of the story when
it is discussed that now they can find a place to live that is not only cheaper
in rent, since they can downsize now that Gregor is dead, but also has a better
location and is more practical than their current living conditions, which
Gregor had selected. This implied, to
me, that Gregor’s family viewed him as a hindrance that had not allowed them to
be happy. Yet, Gregor was the one that
provided food on the table, shelter, and some sense of family order. There were so many poignant moments in this story
for Gregor. Initially, when he goes
through the transition of metamorphosis, it is so difficult for him to get
up. He struggles so much to get out of
bed and it takes him a long time. To me
this was representative of his struggle to find a place and position in his
family. He had to work hard to become a
traveling salesman and also to pay off his father’s debt and provide for his
family. He also had to work to establish
a position within his own family which still seemed to be a struggle for
him. I felt the symbolism when he
finally took the proper posture for a vermin and “flopped down upon his many
tiny legs. The instant this happened, he
felt a physical ease and comfort for the first time that morning.” I saw this as relief that he no longer had to
stand and represent his family. He was
free of his responsibilities and it felt good and comfortable, which it should
since he was not the father and should not have had the responsibility in the
first place. It felt comfortable because
he was being allowed to assume the role of a son rather than the father and
provider (despite the fact that he was now not even the son, but a pest
instead). It was sad that after all
Gregor had done for his family the only time they noticed his sacrifice was
when he had died and was no longer standing, even on his little legs. Once he had been drawn completely down to the
floor with no ability to stand in any form, then they noticed him and what he
had gone through.
The thing that
struck me most with the Marquise in “The Marquise of O-” was how her stances
changed depending on what role she was playing.
It seemed that as a daughter or sister she was always on her knees, or
some other low position but whenever it came time for her to represent her own
family, herself and her children, she would rise up, stand up for them, and let
her stature show her position and role as a mother and widow. For instance, when the father banished her
from his house, “she had just thrown herself at his feet and tremblingly
clasped his knees.” And then rose up to run from the room when the pistol went
off. However, just moments later as she
is gathering her children and getting them ready to leave her brother appears
and tells her that her father has demanded that the children stay with him in
his home. She comes to her feet and uses
her erect stature to stand up for herself and her children and refuses to leave
them there but instead insists that they will be with her, that her father cannot
take them from her. There is also the
newspaper advert that the Marquise places in order to ascertain who the father
of her child is. She is willing to lose
her social standing and be looked down on in order to protect her child and
provide the proper family structure for that child when he/she is born. This is a moment when I view her as standing
erect and strong in defense of the unborn within her.
I found the fact
that once Gregors family had given up on him, he gave up as well and died
shortly after. However, in contrast, when the Marquise’s family believed her
innocence and came to her side, she was strong enough to establish a life for
herself and stand up for herself and her children. Likewise, with Iris, the fact that she
believed in her daughter and tried to provide structure and stability for her enabled
her as well. I liked the idea that Ruth,
her daughter, gets married in a hot air balloon, giving perfect meaning to the
metaphor of rising above…she is rising above it all to build her own familial
structure, thanks to the support of her own mother. To me, all three of these stories emphasize the
role that members of a family play, not only to the structure of a family as a
whole, but also in the ability of individuals within that structure to be able
to stand on their own within the family and society.
good title
ReplyDeletea good way to structure this essay: by family roles
in your description of the fathers, it feels like you downplay the violence perpetrated by the first two fathers (the gun and the demands and the thrown objects and the kicking foot).
nice thought about gregor and his flopping down and feeling good and comfortable.
and as a whole, an intelligent essay. you're a good thinker, a good writer.